Skip to main content
Journal cover image

The case for practical clinical trials in psychiatry.

Publication ,  Journal Article
March, JS; Silva, SG; Compton, S; Shapiro, M; Califf, R; Krishnan, R
Published in: Am J Psychiatry
May 2005

OBJECTIVE: Clinical trials in psychiatry frequently fail to maximize clinical utility for practicing clinicians, or, stated differently, available evidence is not perceived by clinicians (and other decision makers) as sufficiently relevant to clinical practice, thereby diluting its impact. To attain maximum clinical relevance and acceptability, researchers must conduct clinical trials designed to meet the needs of clinicians and others who are making decisions about patients' care. The authors present the case for psychiatry's adoption of the practical clinical trials model, which is widely used in research in other areas of medicine. METHOD: The authors outline the characteristics and scope of practical clinical trials, give examples of practical clinical trials, and discuss the challenges of using the practical clinical trials model in psychiatry, including issues of funding. RESULTS: Practical clinical trials, which are intended to provide generalizable answers to important clinical questions without bias, are characterized by eight key features: a straightforward clinically relevant question, a representative sample of patients and practice settings, sufficient power to identify modest clinically relevant effects, randomization to protect against bias, clinical uncertainty regarding the outcome of treatment at the patient level, assessment and treatment protocols that enact best clinical practices, simple and clinically relevant outcomes, and limited subject and investigator burden. CONCLUSIONS: To implement the practical clinical trials model in psychiatry will require stable funding for network construction and maintenance plus methodological innovation in governance and trial selection, assessment, treatment, data management, site management, and data analytic procedures.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am J Psychiatry

DOI

ISSN

0002-953X

Publication Date

May 2005

Volume

162

Issue

5

Start / End Page

836 / 846

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Research Support as Topic
  • Research Design
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Psychiatry
  • Psychiatry
  • Patient Selection
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Mental Disorders
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
March, J. S., Silva, S. G., Compton, S., Shapiro, M., Califf, R., & Krishnan, R. (2005). The case for practical clinical trials in psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry, 162(5), 836–846. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.836
March, John S., Susan G. Silva, Scott Compton, Mark Shapiro, Robert Califf, and Ranga Krishnan. “The case for practical clinical trials in psychiatry.Am J Psychiatry 162, no. 5 (May 2005): 836–46. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.836.
March JS, Silva SG, Compton S, Shapiro M, Califf R, Krishnan R. The case for practical clinical trials in psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 May;162(5):836–46.
March, John S., et al. “The case for practical clinical trials in psychiatry.Am J Psychiatry, vol. 162, no. 5, May 2005, pp. 836–46. Pubmed, doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.836.
March JS, Silva SG, Compton S, Shapiro M, Califf R, Krishnan R. The case for practical clinical trials in psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 May;162(5):836–846.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Psychiatry

DOI

ISSN

0002-953X

Publication Date

May 2005

Volume

162

Issue

5

Start / End Page

836 / 846

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Research Support as Topic
  • Research Design
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Psychiatry
  • Psychiatry
  • Patient Selection
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Mental Disorders