Skip to main content

Transport time and care processes for patients transferred with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction in Carolina emergency rooms experience.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Muñoz, D; Roettig, ML; Monk, L; Al-Khalidi, H; Jollis, JG; Granger, CB
Published in: Circ Cardiovasc Interv
August 1, 2012

BACKGROUND: For patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention, guidelines have called for device activation within 90 minutes of initial presentation. Fewer than 20% of transferred patients are treated in such a timely fashion. We examine the association between transfer drive times and door-to-device (D2D) times in a network of North Carolina hospitals. We compare the feasibility of timely percutaneous coronary intervention using ground versus air transfer. METHODS AND RESULTS: We perform a retrospective analysis of the relationship between transfer drive times and D2D times in a 119-hospital ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction statewide network. Between July 2008 and December 2009, 1537 ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients underwent interhospital transfer for reperfusion via primary percutaneous coronary intervention. For ground transfers, median D2D time was 93 minutes for drive times ≤30 minutes, 117 minutes for drive times of 31 to 45 minutes, and 121 minutes for drive times >45 minutes. For air transfers, median D2D time was 125 minutes for drive times of 31 to 45 minutes and 138 minutes for drive times >45 minutes. Helicopter transport was associated with longer door-in door-out times and, ultimately, was associated with median D2D times that exceeded guideline recommendations, no matter the transfer drive time category. CONCLUSIONS: In a well-developed ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction system, D2D times within 90 to 120 minutes appear most feasible for hospitals within 30-minute transfer drive time. Helicopter transport did not offer D2D time advantages for transferred STEMI patients. This finding appears to be attributable to comparably longer door-in door-out times for air transfers.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Circ Cardiovasc Interv

DOI

EISSN

1941-7632

Publication Date

August 1, 2012

Volume

5

Issue

4

Start / End Page

555 / 562

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Transportation of Patients
  • Time-to-Treatment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Registries
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Patient Transfer
  • North Carolina
  • Myocardial Reperfusion
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Morbidity
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Muñoz, D., Roettig, M. L., Monk, L., Al-Khalidi, H., Jollis, J. G., & Granger, C. B. (2012). Transport time and care processes for patients transferred with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction in Carolina emergency rooms experience. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 5(4), 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.968461
Muñoz, Daniel, Mayme L. Roettig, Lisa Monk, Hussein Al-Khalidi, James G. Jollis, and Christopher B. Granger. “Transport time and care processes for patients transferred with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction in Carolina emergency rooms experience.Circ Cardiovasc Interv 5, no. 4 (August 1, 2012): 555–62. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.968461.
Muñoz, Daniel, et al. “Transport time and care processes for patients transferred with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction in Carolina emergency rooms experience.Circ Cardiovasc Interv, vol. 5, no. 4, Aug. 2012, pp. 555–62. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.968461.

Published In

Circ Cardiovasc Interv

DOI

EISSN

1941-7632

Publication Date

August 1, 2012

Volume

5

Issue

4

Start / End Page

555 / 562

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Transportation of Patients
  • Time-to-Treatment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Registries
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Patient Transfer
  • North Carolina
  • Myocardial Reperfusion
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Morbidity