Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Refining clinical trial composite outcomes: an application to the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic-3 (ASSENT-3) trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Armstrong, PW; Westerhout, CM; Van de Werf, F; Califf, RM; Welsh, RC; Wilcox, RG; Bakal, JA
Published in: Am Heart J
May 2011

BACKGROUND: Traditional time-to-event analysis assigns equal weight to the first event in the composite end point. This is counterintuitive to many stakeholders. METHODS: We constructed weights for components of a composite efficacy end point and a net clinical outcome by including metrics of safety and efficacy and compared the weighted with the traditional approach. Through an externally validated, clinician-investigator Delphi panel, the relative severity of individual components of a composite end point (30-day death, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, and congestive heart failure) was determined. The net clinical outcome was assessed through the incorporation of risk thresholds for safety events (intracranial hemorrhage and major systemic bleeding). These weights were then applied to a modified analysis of the ASSENT-3 trial. RESULTS: The weights for the efficacy composite were as follows: death, 1.0; shock, 0.5; congestive heart failure, 0.3; and recurrent myocardial infarction, 0.2. The traditional time-to-first-event approach demonstrated a comparable advantage for both enoxaparin (enox) and abciximab (abx) over unfractionated heparin (P = .05), whereas the weighted efficacy analysis suggested an advantage for enox and similar outcomes between unfractionated heparin and abx (P = .2). The apparent advantage of enox was attenuated when the net clinical outcome was examined; the apparent efficacy of abx combination therapy was also diminished by an elevated major systemic bleeding rate (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This novel approach adds an alternative dimension to treatment evaluation by more efficiently incorporating the differential value of all events in each patient. Further development and application of this approach to future trial design and analysis are warranted.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Am Heart J

DOI

EISSN

1097-6744

Publication Date

May 2011

Volume

161

Issue

5

Start / End Page

848 / 854

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Thrombolytic Therapy
  • Risk Assessment
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Odds Ratio
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Humans
  • Fibrinolytic Agents
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Armstrong, P. W., Westerhout, C. M., Van de Werf, F., Califf, R. M., Welsh, R. C., Wilcox, R. G., & Bakal, J. A. (2011). Refining clinical trial composite outcomes: an application to the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic-3 (ASSENT-3) trial. Am Heart J, 161(5), 848–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.12.026
Armstrong, Paul W., Cynthia M. Westerhout, Frans Van de Werf, Robert M. Califf, Robert C. Welsh, Robert G. Wilcox, and Jeffrey A. Bakal. “Refining clinical trial composite outcomes: an application to the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic-3 (ASSENT-3) trial.Am Heart J 161, no. 5 (May 2011): 848–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.12.026.
Armstrong PW, Westerhout CM, Van de Werf F, Califf RM, Welsh RC, Wilcox RG, et al. Refining clinical trial composite outcomes: an application to the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic-3 (ASSENT-3) trial. Am Heart J. 2011 May;161(5):848–54.
Armstrong, Paul W., et al. “Refining clinical trial composite outcomes: an application to the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic-3 (ASSENT-3) trial.Am Heart J, vol. 161, no. 5, May 2011, pp. 848–54. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2010.12.026.
Armstrong PW, Westerhout CM, Van de Werf F, Califf RM, Welsh RC, Wilcox RG, Bakal JA. Refining clinical trial composite outcomes: an application to the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic-3 (ASSENT-3) trial. Am Heart J. 2011 May;161(5):848–854.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am Heart J

DOI

EISSN

1097-6744

Publication Date

May 2011

Volume

161

Issue

5

Start / End Page

848 / 854

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Thrombolytic Therapy
  • Risk Assessment
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Odds Ratio
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Humans
  • Fibrinolytic Agents
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology