Skip to main content
Journal cover image

The effects of femoral graft placement on in vivo knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Abebe, ES; Utturkar, GM; Taylor, DC; Spritzer, CE; Kim, JP; Moorman, CT; Garrett, WE; DeFrate, LE
Published in: J Biomech
March 15, 2011

Achieving anatomical graft placement remains a concern in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of femoral graft placement on the ability of ACL reconstruction to restore normal knee kinematics under in vivo loading conditions. Two different groups of patients were studied: one in which the femoral tunnel was placed near the anterior and proximal border of the ACL (anteroproximal group, n=12) and another where the femoral tunnel was placed near the center of the ACL (anatomic group, n=10) MR imaging and biplanar fluoroscopy were used to measure in vivo kinematics in these patients during a quasi-static lunge. Patients with anteroproximal graft placement had up to 3.4mm more anterior tibial translation, 1.1mm more medial tibial translation and 3.7° more internal tibial rotation compared to the contralateral side. Patients with anatomic graft placement had motion that more closely replicated that of the intact knee, with anterior tibial translation within 0.8mm, medial tibial translation within 0.5mm, and internal tibial rotation within 1°. Grafts placed anteroproximally on the femur likely provide insufficient restraint to these motions due to a more vertical orientation. Anatomical femoral placement of the graft is more likely to reproduce normal ACL orientation, resulting in a more stable knee. Therefore, achieving anatomical graft placement on the femur is crucial to restoring normal knee function and may decrease the rates of joint degeneration after ACL reconstruction.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Biomech

DOI

EISSN

1873-2380

Publication Date

March 15, 2011

Volume

44

Issue

5

Start / End Page

924 / 929

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tibia
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures
  • Motion
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Knee Joint
  • Knee
  • Humans
  • Fluoroscopy
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Abebe, E. S., Utturkar, G. M., Taylor, D. C., Spritzer, C. E., Kim, J. P., Moorman, C. T., … DeFrate, L. E. (2011). The effects of femoral graft placement on in vivo knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Biomech, 44(5), 924–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.028
Abebe, E. S., G. M. Utturkar, D. C. Taylor, C. E. Spritzer, J. P. Kim, C. T. Moorman, W. E. Garrett, and L. E. DeFrate. “The effects of femoral graft placement on in vivo knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.J Biomech 44, no. 5 (March 15, 2011): 924–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.028.
Abebe ES, Utturkar GM, Taylor DC, Spritzer CE, Kim JP, Moorman CT, et al. The effects of femoral graft placement on in vivo knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Biomech. 2011 Mar 15;44(5):924–9.
Abebe, E. S., et al. “The effects of femoral graft placement on in vivo knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.J Biomech, vol. 44, no. 5, Mar. 2011, pp. 924–29. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.028.
Abebe ES, Utturkar GM, Taylor DC, Spritzer CE, Kim JP, Moorman CT, Garrett WE, DeFrate LE. The effects of femoral graft placement on in vivo knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Biomech. 2011 Mar 15;44(5):924–929.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Biomech

DOI

EISSN

1873-2380

Publication Date

March 15, 2011

Volume

44

Issue

5

Start / End Page

924 / 929

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tibia
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures
  • Motion
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Knee Joint
  • Knee
  • Humans
  • Fluoroscopy