Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Triple vs Dual Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Lopes, RD; Rao, M; Simon, DN; Thomas, L; Ansell, J; Fonarow, GC; Gersh, BJ; Go, AS; Hylek, EM; Kowey, P; Piccini, JP; Singer, DE; Chang, P ...
Published in: Am J Med
June 2016

BACKGROUND: The role of triple antithrombotic therapy vs dual antithrombotic therapy in patients with both atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease remains unclear. This study explores the differences in treatment practices and outcomes between triple antithrombotic therapy and dual antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease. METHODS: Using the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (n = 10,135), we analyzed outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (n = 1827) according to treatment with triple antithrombotic therapy (defined as concurrent therapy with an oral anticoagulant, a thienopyridine, and aspirin) or dual antithrombotic therapy (comprising either an oral anticoagulant and one antiplatelet agent [OAC plus AA] or 2 antiplatelet drugs and no anticoagulant [DAP]). RESULTS: The use of triple antithrombotic therapy, OAC plus AA, and DAP at baseline was 8.5% (n = 155), 80.4% (n = 1468), and 11.2% (n = 204), respectively. Among patients treated with OAC plus AA, aspirin was the most common antiplatelet agent used (90%), followed by clopidogrel (10%) and prasugrel (0.1%). The use of triple antithrombotic therapy was not affected by patient risk of either stroke or bleeding. Patients treated with triple antithrombotic therapy at baseline were hospitalized for all causes (including cardiovascular) more often than patients on OAC plus AA (adjusted hazard ratio 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-2.26; P <.0001) or DAP (hazard ratio 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.65; P = .0018). Rates of major bleeding or a combined cardiovascular outcome were not significantly different by treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Choice of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease was not affected by patient stroke or bleeding risks. Triple antithrombotic therapy-treated patients were more likely to be hospitalized for all causes than those on OAC plus AA or on DAP.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am J Med

DOI

EISSN

1555-7162

Publication Date

June 2016

Volume

129

Issue

6

Start / End Page

592 / 599.e1

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Warfarin
  • Ticlopidine
  • Stroke
  • Registries
  • Pyridines
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Myocardial Infarction
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lopes, R. D., Rao, M., Simon, D. N., Thomas, L., Ansell, J., Fonarow, G. C., … Mahaffey, K. W. (2016). Triple vs Dual Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease. Am J Med, 129(6), 592-599.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.12.026
Lopes, Renato D., Meena Rao, DaJuanicia N. Simon, Laine Thomas, Jack Ansell, Gregg C. Fonarow, Bernard J. Gersh, et al. “Triple vs Dual Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease.Am J Med 129, no. 6 (June 2016): 592-599.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.12.026.
Lopes RD, Rao M, Simon DN, Thomas L, Ansell J, Fonarow GC, et al. Triple vs Dual Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease. Am J Med. 2016 Jun;129(6):592-599.e1.
Lopes, Renato D., et al. “Triple vs Dual Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease.Am J Med, vol. 129, no. 6, June 2016, pp. 592-599.e1. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.12.026.
Lopes RD, Rao M, Simon DN, Thomas L, Ansell J, Fonarow GC, Gersh BJ, Go AS, Hylek EM, Kowey P, Piccini JP, Singer DE, Chang P, Peterson ED, Mahaffey KW. Triple vs Dual Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease. Am J Med. 2016 Jun;129(6):592-599.e1.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Med

DOI

EISSN

1555-7162

Publication Date

June 2016

Volume

129

Issue

6

Start / End Page

592 / 599.e1

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Warfarin
  • Ticlopidine
  • Stroke
  • Registries
  • Pyridines
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Myocardial Infarction