Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Evaluating fitness-for-use of electronic health records in pragmatic clinical trials: reported practices and recommendations.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Raman, SR; O'Brien, EC; Hammill, BG; Nelson, AJ; Fish, LJ; Curtis, LH; Marsolo, K
Published in: J Am Med Inform Assoc
April 13, 2022

OBJECTIVE: To empirically explore how pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) that used real-world data (RWD) assessed study-specific fitness-for-use. METHODS: We conducted interviews and surveys with PCT teams who used electronic health record (EHR) data to ascertain endpoints. The survey cataloged key concerns about RWD, activities used to assess data fitness-for-use, and related barriers encountered by study teams. Patterns and commonalities across trials were used to develop recommendations for study-specific fitness-for-use assessments. RESULTS: Of 15 invited trial teams, 7 interviews were conducted. Of 31 invited trials, 15 responded to the survey. Most respondents had prior experience using RWD (93%). Major concerns about EHR data were data reliability, missingness or incompleteness of EHR elements, variation in data quality across study sites, and presence of implausible or incorrect values. Although many PCTs conducted fitness-for-use activities (eg, data quality assessments, 11/14, 79%), less than a quarter did so before choosing a data source. Fitness-for-use activities, findings, and resulting study design changes were not often publically documented. Overall costs and personnel costs were barriers to fitness-for-use assessments. DISCUSSION: These results support three recommendations for PCTs that use EHR data for endpoint ascertainment. Trials should detail the rationale and plan for study-specific fitness-for-use activities, conduct study-specific fitness-for-use assessments early in the prestudy phase to inform study design changes before the trial begins, and share results of fitness-for-use assessments and description of relevant challenges and facilitators. CONCLUSION: These recommendations can help researchers and end-users of real-world evidence improve characterization of RWD reliability and relevance in the PCT-specific context.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Am Med Inform Assoc

DOI

EISSN

1527-974X

Publication Date

April 13, 2022

Volume

29

Issue

5

Start / End Page

798 / 804

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Research Design
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Medical Informatics
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Data Accuracy
  • 46 Information and computing sciences
  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Raman, S. R., O’Brien, E. C., Hammill, B. G., Nelson, A. J., Fish, L. J., Curtis, L. H., & Marsolo, K. (2022). Evaluating fitness-for-use of electronic health records in pragmatic clinical trials: reported practices and recommendations. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 29(5), 798–804. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac004
Raman, Sudha R., Emily C. O’Brien, Bradley G. Hammill, Adam J. Nelson, Laura J. Fish, Lesley H. Curtis, and Keith Marsolo. “Evaluating fitness-for-use of electronic health records in pragmatic clinical trials: reported practices and recommendations.J Am Med Inform Assoc 29, no. 5 (April 13, 2022): 798–804. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac004.
Raman SR, O’Brien EC, Hammill BG, Nelson AJ, Fish LJ, Curtis LH, et al. Evaluating fitness-for-use of electronic health records in pragmatic clinical trials: reported practices and recommendations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):798–804.
Raman, Sudha R., et al. “Evaluating fitness-for-use of electronic health records in pragmatic clinical trials: reported practices and recommendations.J Am Med Inform Assoc, vol. 29, no. 5, Apr. 2022, pp. 798–804. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac004.
Raman SR, O’Brien EC, Hammill BG, Nelson AJ, Fish LJ, Curtis LH, Marsolo K. Evaluating fitness-for-use of electronic health records in pragmatic clinical trials: reported practices and recommendations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):798–804.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Am Med Inform Assoc

DOI

EISSN

1527-974X

Publication Date

April 13, 2022

Volume

29

Issue

5

Start / End Page

798 / 804

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Research Design
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Medical Informatics
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Data Accuracy
  • 46 Information and computing sciences
  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences