Transvenous extraction of conduction system and lumenless pacing leads.

INTRODUCTION: Conduction system pacing (CSP), often accomplished with lumenless pacing leads, is increasingly employed to achieve physiologic ventricular activation. There are limited data on the extraction of these leads. The objective of this study was to describe the safety and efficacy of extraction of CSP pacing leads and compare outcomes with extraction of non-CSP lumenless leads. METHODS: Patients undergoing CSP/non-CSP lumenless lead removal were included. Outcomes of interest included rates of complete procedural success, complications, and successful reimplantation. RESULTS: Overall, 23 patients were included (n = 14 with CSP and n = 9 with non-CSP lumenless leads implanted in the right atrium, right ventricle, or septum). The mean age was 52.7 ± 24.0 years, 30% were female, and the mean lead age was 4.5 ± 4.4 years. The complete procedural success rate was 100%. One serious complication occurred in the non-CSP group but was unrelated to the lead of interest. Manual traction alone was successful in 57% of CSP cases (mean lead age 2.4 ± 1.7 years) and in 11% of non-CSP cases (mean lead age 7.9 ± 5.3 years). Laser sheaths were used in 43% of CSP cases and 89% of non-CSP cases; rotational cutting tools were used in no CSP cases and in 33% of non-CSP cases. Reimplantation in the conduction system was attempted with a left bundle branch pacing lead and successful in 80% (n = 4/5). CONCLUSION: Extraction of CSP and non-CSP lumenless leads is feasible with a high success rate and a good safety profile. CSP reimplantation after extraction is also feasible with good electrical performance.

Duke Scholars

Author Sean Pokorney Medicine, Cardiology

Author Robert Kenneth Lewis Medicine, Cardiology

Author Donald Dale Hegland Medicine, Cardiology

Author Daniel Friedman Medicine, Cardiology

Author Jonathan Paul Piccini Sr. Medicine, Cardiology