Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Low intensity focused ultrasound stimulation in stroke: A phase I safety & feasibility trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Huang, Z; Charalambous, CC; Chen, M; Kim, T; Sokhadze, E; Song, A; Jung, S-H; Shekhar, S; Feld, JA; Jiang, X; Feng, W
Published in: Brain Stimul
2025

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the maximum safe spatial-peak pulse-average intensity (ISPPA) of low-intensity focused ultrasound stimulation (LIFUS) in stroke patients and explore its effect on motor learning and corticospinal excitability. METHODS: We adopted the classic 3 + 3 design to escalate ISPPA (estimated in-vivo transcranial value) from 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, to 8 W/cm2. Stopping rules were pre-defined: 2nd-degree scalp burn, clinical seizure, new lesion on diffusion-weighted imaging or major reduction in apparent diffusion coefficient, and participant discontinuation due to any reason. We applied 12-min LIFUS over the ipsilesional motor cortex while participants were concurrently practicing 3 blocks of a motor sequence learning (MSL) task using the affected hand. We measured MSL (response time) and corticospinal excitability (motor evoked potential) pre- and post-stimulation and compared MSL and corticospinal excitability between the LOW (0, 1, and 2 W/cm2) and HIGH (4, 6, and 8 W/cm2) groups. RESULTS: ISPPA was escalated to 8 W/cm2 with 18 stroke participants without meeting the stopping rules. Compared to the LOW, more participants in the HIGH performed better on MSL (6/9 vs. 0/9, p = 0.009) and showed a sign of greater corticospinal excitability (7/9 vs. 5/9, p = 0.62). INTERPRETATION: Our phase-I safety study suggests that one session of LIFUS up to 8 W/cm2 ISPPA is safe and feasible in stroke patients, and LIFUS at high intensity induces positive changes in both MSL and corticospinal excitability. The next logical step is to conduct a phase-II trial testing the efficacy of LIFUS and continuously monitoring its safety profiles.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Brain Stimul

DOI

EISSN

1876-4754

Publication Date

2025

Volume

18

Issue

1

Start / End Page

179 / 187

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonic Therapy
  • Stroke Rehabilitation
  • Stroke
  • Pyramidal Tracts
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Motor Cortex
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Huang, Z., Charalambous, C. C., Chen, M., Kim, T., Sokhadze, E., Song, A., … Feng, W. (2025). Low intensity focused ultrasound stimulation in stroke: A phase I safety & feasibility trial. Brain Stimul, 18(1), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2025.01.015
Huang, Ziping, Charalambos C. Charalambous, Mengyue Chen, Taewon Kim, Estate Sokhadze, Allen Song, Sin-Ho Jung, et al. “Low intensity focused ultrasound stimulation in stroke: A phase I safety & feasibility trial.Brain Stimul 18, no. 1 (2025): 179–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2025.01.015.
Huang Z, Charalambous CC, Chen M, Kim T, Sokhadze E, Song A, et al. Low intensity focused ultrasound stimulation in stroke: A phase I safety & feasibility trial. Brain Stimul. 2025;18(1):179–87.
Huang, Ziping, et al. “Low intensity focused ultrasound stimulation in stroke: A phase I safety & feasibility trial.Brain Stimul, vol. 18, no. 1, 2025, pp. 179–87. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.brs.2025.01.015.
Huang Z, Charalambous CC, Chen M, Kim T, Sokhadze E, Song A, Jung S-H, Shekhar S, Feld JA, Jiang X, Feng W. Low intensity focused ultrasound stimulation in stroke: A phase I safety & feasibility trial. Brain Stimul. 2025;18(1):179–187.
Journal cover image

Published In

Brain Stimul

DOI

EISSN

1876-4754

Publication Date

2025

Volume

18

Issue

1

Start / End Page

179 / 187

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonic Therapy
  • Stroke Rehabilitation
  • Stroke
  • Pyramidal Tracts
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Motor Cortex
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Female