Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Sample Size and Power Calculations With Win Measures Based on Hierarchical Endpoints.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Barnhart, H; Lokhnygina, Y; Matsouaka, R; Halabi, S; Yanez, D; Mentz, RJ; Rockhold, F
Published in: Stat Med
May 2025

Win measures, such as win ratio, win odds, net benefit, and desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR), have become popular approaches for the analysis of hierarchical endpoints in clinical studies. Sample size and power calculations with win measures based on hierarchical endpoints are often based on simulation studies that can be cumbersome. Existing sample size and power formulas require investigators to specify clinically significant and meaningful magnitudes of win measures and probability of ties that are difficult to elicit based on prior published literature or preliminary data. In this paper, we provide sample size and power calculation formulas for the four win measures. To facilitate the formula-based sample size or power calculations, we provide formulas to compute overall win measures and overall probability of ties needed by using the specification of marginal win measures and marginal probability of ties that are readily available from clinical investigators or literature. The latter formulas provide a novel way to specify a meaningful and justifiable magnitude of win measures and the magnitude of probability of ties. Therefore, they can be readily used to evaluate the powers based on the number of multiple endpoints, the ordering, and types of endpoints. Our extensive simulation studies show that the power estimations based on these formulas are often like the simulated powers for any type of correlated hierarchical endpoints except for scenarios with very high correlations between endpoints. We illustrate the usefulness of our formulas by using data from three trials with different types of hierarchical endpoints.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Stat Med

DOI

EISSN

1097-0258

Publication Date

May 2025

Volume

44

Issue

10-12

Start / End Page

e70096

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Statistics & Probability
  • Sample Size
  • Models, Statistical
  • Humans
  • Endpoint Determination
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Computer Simulation
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • 4905 Statistics
  • 4202 Epidemiology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Barnhart, H., Lokhnygina, Y., Matsouaka, R., Halabi, S., Yanez, D., Mentz, R. J., & Rockhold, F. (2025). Sample Size and Power Calculations With Win Measures Based on Hierarchical Endpoints. Stat Med, 44(10–12), e70096. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70096
Barnhart, Huiman, Yuliya Lokhnygina, Roland Matsouaka, Susan Halabi, David Yanez, Robert J. Mentz, and Frank Rockhold. “Sample Size and Power Calculations With Win Measures Based on Hierarchical Endpoints.Stat Med 44, no. 10–12 (May 2025): e70096. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70096.
Barnhart H, Lokhnygina Y, Matsouaka R, Halabi S, Yanez D, Mentz RJ, et al. Sample Size and Power Calculations With Win Measures Based on Hierarchical Endpoints. Stat Med. 2025 May;44(10–12):e70096.
Barnhart, Huiman, et al. “Sample Size and Power Calculations With Win Measures Based on Hierarchical Endpoints.Stat Med, vol. 44, no. 10–12, May 2025, p. e70096. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/sim.70096.
Barnhart H, Lokhnygina Y, Matsouaka R, Halabi S, Yanez D, Mentz RJ, Rockhold F. Sample Size and Power Calculations With Win Measures Based on Hierarchical Endpoints. Stat Med. 2025 May;44(10–12):e70096.
Journal cover image

Published In

Stat Med

DOI

EISSN

1097-0258

Publication Date

May 2025

Volume

44

Issue

10-12

Start / End Page

e70096

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Statistics & Probability
  • Sample Size
  • Models, Statistical
  • Humans
  • Endpoint Determination
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Computer Simulation
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • 4905 Statistics
  • 4202 Epidemiology