Skip to main content
medRxiv

Comprehensive Comparison of a Genotype-Forward vs. Phenotype-Forward Approach for Monogenic Cardiovascular Diseases in the UK Biobank Cohort

Preprints
Ramaker, M; Corey, K; Regan, J; Coles, S; Abdulrahim, J; Kottilil, K; Nafissi, N; Amos, K; Neal, MM; Kwee, LC; Selvaraj, S; Shah, S
2025

Monogenic cardiovascular diseases (MCVD) remain substantially under-diagnosed, and thus interest is shifting from a phenotype-forward approach towards a genotype-first strategy that applies to population-wide genomic screening. We evaluated the prevalence of pathogenic and predicted pathogenic MCVD variants and assessed disease expression in the population-based UK Biobank (UKB) cohort to determine whether yield is greater in phenotype-versus genotype-forward approach. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) predicted to be pathogenic (pp-VUS) in 47 MCVD genes were assessed. In the genotype-forward approach, UKB participants with P/LPs or pp-VUS were assessed for symptoms of disease using electronic health record (EHR) interrogation, emulating a clinical approach to population-based screening. In the phenotype-forward approach, participants with stricter EHR-based evidence of disease expression were identified (emulating current clinical care) and the presence of P/LPs and pp-VUS was determined. Following QC, 467,850 participants were included. Overall, 1 in 125 participants in UKB carry an MCVD P/LP. In the genotype-forward approach, 3,709 (0.79%) participants carried an MCVD P/LP and 42.1% of these had symptoms of the associated MCVD; another 29,269 (6.3%) carried a pp-VUS with 21.5% of these having symptoms of disease. In the phenotype-forward approach, 62,488 (13.4%) expressed an MCVD using strict evidence of disease expression and of these individuals 1% carried an associated P/LP variant and 2.4% carried an associated pp-VUS. We show here that a genotype-forward approach leads to a 2.5 times higher diagnostic yield (3.6 times higher when considering pp-VUS) compared with the phenotype-forward approach, which missed 936 P/LP carriers with disease symptoms. While cost, access and ethics need to be considered, these results support expanded population-based genetic screening to improve diagnosis of potentially treatable MCVD.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

DOI

Publication Date

2025
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Ramaker, M., Corey, K., Regan, J., Coles, S., Abdulrahim, J., Kottilil, K., … Shah, S. (2025). Comprehensive Comparison of a Genotype-Forward vs. Phenotype-Forward Approach for Monogenic Cardiovascular Diseases in the UK Biobank Cohort. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.11.25335614
Ramaker, Megan, Kristin Corey, Jessica Regan, Sara Coles, Jawan Abdulrahim, Kalyani Kottilil, Navid Nafissi, et al. “Comprehensive Comparison of a Genotype-Forward vs. Phenotype-Forward Approach for Monogenic Cardiovascular Diseases in the UK Biobank Cohort.” MedRxiv, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.11.25335614.
Ramaker M, Corey K, Regan J, Coles S, Abdulrahim J, Kottilil K, Nafissi N, Amos K, Neal MM, Kwee LC, Selvaraj S, Shah S. Comprehensive Comparison of a Genotype-Forward vs. Phenotype-Forward Approach for Monogenic Cardiovascular Diseases in the UK Biobank Cohort. medRxiv. 2025.

DOI

Publication Date

2025