Skip to main content

Outcomes of pelvis resections and reconstructions using 3D printed cutting guides referencing the acetabulum

Journal articles  - Journal Article
Lau, T; Wesorick, BR; Gall, K; Visgauss, JD; Brigman, BE; Eward, WC
Published in: Surgical Oncology Insight
September 1, 2026

Background: Oncologic resections and reconstructions of the pelvis are among the most challenging procedures in orthopedic surgery due to complex anatomy, tumor variability, and the need for precise margins. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) created with 3D printing has emerged as a promising solution, but accurate intraoperative referencing remains difficult. This study evaluates the use of novel acetabular-referencing PSI cutting guides for pelvic tumor resections and reconstructions. Methods: Five patients (mean age 57.2 years) underwent pelvic resections with acetabular-referencing PSI between 2019 and 2023. Each guide incorporated a hemispherical feature seating within the acetabulum after femoral head removal. Postoperative CT reconstructions were compared with preoperative plans to assess resection accuracy, implant alignment, operative time, and margin status. Results: All patients achieved negative gross margins; two had microscopically positive margins (one planned). Mean operative time was 8 h 52 min, including two complex procedures. Mean deviations were 8.32 mm for center of rotation (CoR) and 7.37 mm for center of gravity (CoG). Directional CoR deviations averaged 2.62 mm anteroposteriorly, 6.30 mm mediolaterally, and 3.92 mm superoinferiorly. Angular deviations averaged 1.88° in anteversion and –2.54° in inclination. All implants were positioned within or near accepted thresholds for pelvic reconstruction accuracy. Conclusions: Acetabular-referencing PSI enabled reproducible guide placement and accurate osteotomies in complex pelvic resections without increasing operative time. This technique offers a reliable alternative to surface-contoured guides and may enhance precision in oncologic reconstruction by mitigating challenges of intraoperative interfacing. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm functional outcomes and implant survivorship.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Surgical Oncology Insight

DOI

EISSN

2950-2470

Publication Date

September 1, 2026

Volume

3

Issue

3
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lau, T., Wesorick, B. R., Gall, K., Visgauss, J. D., Brigman, B. E., & Eward, W. C. (2026). Outcomes of pelvis resections and reconstructions using 3D printed cutting guides referencing the acetabulum (Accepted). Surgical Oncology Insight, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soi.2026.100240
Lau, T., B. R. Wesorick, K. Gall, J. D. Visgauss, B. E. Brigman, and W. C. Eward. “Outcomes of pelvis resections and reconstructions using 3D printed cutting guides referencing the acetabulum (Accepted).” Surgical Oncology Insight 3, no. 3 (September 1, 2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soi.2026.100240.
Lau T, Wesorick BR, Gall K, Visgauss JD, Brigman BE, Eward WC. Outcomes of pelvis resections and reconstructions using 3D printed cutting guides referencing the acetabulum (Accepted). Surgical Oncology Insight. 2026 Sep 1;3(3).
Lau, T., et al. “Outcomes of pelvis resections and reconstructions using 3D printed cutting guides referencing the acetabulum (Accepted).” Surgical Oncology Insight, vol. 3, no. 3, Sept. 2026. Scopus, doi:10.1016/j.soi.2026.100240.
Lau T, Wesorick BR, Gall K, Visgauss JD, Brigman BE, Eward WC. Outcomes of pelvis resections and reconstructions using 3D printed cutting guides referencing the acetabulum (Accepted). Surgical Oncology Insight. 2026 Sep 1;3(3).

Published In

Surgical Oncology Insight

DOI

EISSN

2950-2470

Publication Date

September 1, 2026

Volume

3

Issue

3