Skip to main content

Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for treating essential hypertension.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Matchar, DB; McCrory, DC; Orlando, LA; Patel, MR; Patel, UD; Patwardhan, MB; Powers, B; Samsa, GP; Gray, RN
Published in: Ann Intern Med
January 1, 2008

BACKGROUND: The relative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for lowering blood pressure is unknown. PURPOSE: To compare the benefits and harms of ACE inhibitors versus ARBs for treating essential hypertension in adults. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1966 to May 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2, 2006), and selected reference lists were searched for relevant English-language trials. The MEDLINE search was updated to August 2007 to identify head-to-head trials that reported blood pressure outcomes and major cardiovascular events. STUDY SELECTION: 61 clinical studies that directly compared ACE inhibitors versus ARBs in adult patients with essential hypertension, reported an outcome of interest, lasted at least 12 weeks, and included at least 20 patients. DATA EXTRACTION: A standardized protocol with predefined criteria was used to extract data on study design, interventions, population characteristics, and outcomes; evaluate study quality and applicability; and assess the strength of the body of evidence for key outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: ACE inhibitors and ARBs had similar long-term effects on blood pressure (50 studies; strength of evidence, high). No consistent differential effects were observed for other outcomes (few studies reported long-term outcomes), including death, cardiovascular events, quality of life, rate of single antihypertensive agent use, lipid levels, progression to diabetes, left ventricular mass or function, and kidney disease. Consistent fair- to good-quality evidence showed that ACE inhibitors were associated with a greater risk for cough. There were fewer withdrawals due to adverse events and greater persistence with therapy for ARBs than for ACE inhibitors, although this evidence was not definitive. Patient subgroups for whom ACE inhibitors or ARBs were more effective, associated with fewer adverse events, or better tolerated were not identified. LIMITATIONS: Few studies involved a representative sample treated in a typical clinical setting over a long duration, treatment protocols had marked heterogeneity, and substantive amounts of data about important outcomes and patient subgroups were missing. CONCLUSION: Available evidence shows that ACE inhibitors and ARBs have similar effects on blood pressure control, and that ACE inhibitors have higher rates of cough than ARBs. Data regarding other outcomes are limited.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Ann Intern Med

DOI

EISSN

1539-3704

Publication Date

January 1, 2008

Volume

148

Issue

1

Start / End Page

16 / 29

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Risk Factors
  • Quality of Life
  • Hypertension
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Antihypertensive Agents
  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
  • Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Matchar, D. B., McCrory, D. C., Orlando, L. A., Patel, M. R., Patel, U. D., Patwardhan, M. B., … Gray, R. N. (2008). Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for treating essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med, 148(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-1-200801010-00189
Matchar, David B., Douglas C. McCrory, Lori A. Orlando, Manesh R. Patel, Uptal D. Patel, Meenal B. Patwardhan, Benjamin Powers, Gregory P. Samsa, and Rebecca N. Gray. “Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for treating essential hypertension.Ann Intern Med 148, no. 1 (January 1, 2008): 16–29. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-1-200801010-00189.
Matchar DB, McCrory DC, Orlando LA, Patel MR, Patel UD, Patwardhan MB, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for treating essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 1;148(1):16–29.
Matchar, David B., et al. “Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for treating essential hypertension.Ann Intern Med, vol. 148, no. 1, Jan. 2008, pp. 16–29. Pubmed, doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-1-200801010-00189.
Matchar DB, McCrory DC, Orlando LA, Patel MR, Patel UD, Patwardhan MB, Powers B, Samsa GP, Gray RN. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers for treating essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 1;148(1):16–29.

Published In

Ann Intern Med

DOI

EISSN

1539-3704

Publication Date

January 1, 2008

Volume

148

Issue

1

Start / End Page

16 / 29

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Risk Factors
  • Quality of Life
  • Hypertension
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Antihypertensive Agents
  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
  • Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers