Comparison of the Digene Hybrid Capture System Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA (version 2.0), Roche CMV UL54 analyte-specific reagent, and QIAGEN RealArt CMV LightCycler PCR reagent tests using AcroMetrix OptiQuant CMV DNA quantification panels and specimens from allogeneic-stem-cell transplant recipients.
Publication
, Journal Article
Hanson, KE; Reller, LB; Kurtzberg, J; Horwitz, M; Long, G; Alexander, BD
Published in: J Clin Microbiol
June 2007
The Digene Hybrid Capture system cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA (version 2.0), Roche CMV UL54 analyte-specific reagent, and QIAGEN RealArt CMV LightCycler PCR reagent tests were compared using whole-virus standards and plasma specimens collected from allogeneic-stem-cell transplant recipients. PCR assays showed better speed, sensitivity, and specificity.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
J Clin Microbiol
DOI
ISSN
0095-1137
Publication Date
June 2007
Volume
45
Issue
6
Start / End Page
1972 / 1973
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Viral Proteins
- Transplantation, Homologous
- Stem Cell Transplantation
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Reproducibility of Results
- Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
- Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Microbiology
- Indicators and Reagents
- Humans
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hanson, K. E., Reller, L. B., Kurtzberg, J., Horwitz, M., Long, G., & Alexander, B. D. (2007). Comparison of the Digene Hybrid Capture System Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA (version 2.0), Roche CMV UL54 analyte-specific reagent, and QIAGEN RealArt CMV LightCycler PCR reagent tests using AcroMetrix OptiQuant CMV DNA quantification panels and specimens from allogeneic-stem-cell transplant recipients. J Clin Microbiol, 45(6), 1972–1973. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02515-06
Hanson, Kimberly E., L Barth Reller, Joanne Kurtzberg, Mitchell Horwitz, Gwynn Long, and Barbara D. Alexander. “Comparison of the Digene Hybrid Capture System Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA (version 2.0), Roche CMV UL54 analyte-specific reagent, and QIAGEN RealArt CMV LightCycler PCR reagent tests using AcroMetrix OptiQuant CMV DNA quantification panels and specimens from allogeneic-stem-cell transplant recipients.” J Clin Microbiol 45, no. 6 (June 2007): 1972–73. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02515-06.
Hanson KE, Reller LB, Kurtzberg J, Horwitz M, Long G, Alexander BD. Comparison of the Digene Hybrid Capture System Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA (version 2.0), Roche CMV UL54 analyte-specific reagent, and QIAGEN RealArt CMV LightCycler PCR reagent tests using AcroMetrix OptiQuant CMV DNA quantification panels and specimens from allogeneic-stem-cell transplant recipients. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Jun;45(6):1972–3.
Hanson, Kimberly E., et al. “Comparison of the Digene Hybrid Capture System Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA (version 2.0), Roche CMV UL54 analyte-specific reagent, and QIAGEN RealArt CMV LightCycler PCR reagent tests using AcroMetrix OptiQuant CMV DNA quantification panels and specimens from allogeneic-stem-cell transplant recipients.” J Clin Microbiol, vol. 45, no. 6, June 2007, pp. 1972–73. Pubmed, doi:10.1128/JCM.02515-06.
Hanson KE, Reller LB, Kurtzberg J, Horwitz M, Long G, Alexander BD. Comparison of the Digene Hybrid Capture System Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA (version 2.0), Roche CMV UL54 analyte-specific reagent, and QIAGEN RealArt CMV LightCycler PCR reagent tests using AcroMetrix OptiQuant CMV DNA quantification panels and specimens from allogeneic-stem-cell transplant recipients. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Jun;45(6):1972–1973.
Published In
J Clin Microbiol
DOI
ISSN
0095-1137
Publication Date
June 2007
Volume
45
Issue
6
Start / End Page
1972 / 1973
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Viral Proteins
- Transplantation, Homologous
- Stem Cell Transplantation
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Reproducibility of Results
- Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
- Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Microbiology
- Indicators and Reagents
- Humans