Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Screening for cognitive impairment: comparing the performance of four instruments in primary care.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Holsinger, T; Plassman, BL; Stechuchak, KM; Burke, JR; Coffman, CJ; Williams, JW
Published in: J Am Geriatr Soc
June 2012

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether brief cognitive screening tests perform as well as a longer screening test in diagnosis of cognitive impairment, no dementia (CIND) or dementia. DESIGN: A cross-sectional comparison of cognitive screening tests to an independent criterion standard evaluation using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria. Performance of the cognitive screening tests for identifying dementia, and separately for identifying dementia or CIND, was characterized using sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios. SETTING: Three Department of Veterans Affairs primary care clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Of 826 independently living veterans aged 65 and older without a prior diagnosis of dementia, 639 participated and 630 were assigned a research diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS: Screening tests included the modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS; average time to administer, 17 minutes) and three brief instruments: the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS; 4 minutes), the Mini-Cog (3 minutes), and a novel two-item functional memory screen (MF-2; 1.5 minutes). RESULTS: Participants were aged 74.8 on average and were mostly white or black. They were mostly male (92.9%) and had been prescribed a mean of 7.7 medications for chronic conditions. The prevalence of dementia and CIND was 3.3% and 39.2%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for dementia were 86% and 79% for the 3MS, 76% and 73% for the Mini-Cog, 43% and 93% for the MIS, and 38% and 87% for the MF-2, respectively. CONCLUSION: In individuals without a prior diagnosis of cognitive impairment, the prevalence of dementia was low, but the prevalence of CIND was high. The 3MS and Mini-Cog had reasonable performance characteristics for detecting dementia, but a definitive diagnosis requires additional evaluation.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Am Geriatr Soc

DOI

EISSN

1532-5415

Publication Date

June 2012

Volume

60

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1027 / 1036

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Veterans
  • United States
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
  • Mass Screening
  • Male
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Humans
  • Geriatrics
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Holsinger, T., Plassman, B. L., Stechuchak, K. M., Burke, J. R., Coffman, C. J., & Williams, J. W. (2012). Screening for cognitive impairment: comparing the performance of four instruments in primary care. J Am Geriatr Soc, 60(6), 1027–1036. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03967.x
Holsinger, Tracey, Brenda L. Plassman, Karen M. Stechuchak, James R. Burke, Cynthia J. Coffman, and John W. Williams. “Screening for cognitive impairment: comparing the performance of four instruments in primary care.J Am Geriatr Soc 60, no. 6 (June 2012): 1027–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03967.x.
Holsinger T, Plassman BL, Stechuchak KM, Burke JR, Coffman CJ, Williams JW. Screening for cognitive impairment: comparing the performance of four instruments in primary care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Jun;60(6):1027–36.
Holsinger, Tracey, et al. “Screening for cognitive impairment: comparing the performance of four instruments in primary care.J Am Geriatr Soc, vol. 60, no. 6, June 2012, pp. 1027–36. Pubmed, doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03967.x.
Holsinger T, Plassman BL, Stechuchak KM, Burke JR, Coffman CJ, Williams JW. Screening for cognitive impairment: comparing the performance of four instruments in primary care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Jun;60(6):1027–1036.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Am Geriatr Soc

DOI

EISSN

1532-5415

Publication Date

June 2012

Volume

60

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1027 / 1036

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Veterans
  • United States
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
  • Mass Screening
  • Male
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Humans
  • Geriatrics