Skip to main content
construction release_alert
The Scholars Team is working with OIT to resolve some issues with the Scholars search index
cancel
Journal cover image

International clinimetric evaluation of the MG-QOL15, resulting in slight revision and subsequent validation of the MG-QOL15r.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Burns, TM; Sadjadi, R; Utsugisawa, K; Gwathmey, KG; Joshi, A; Jones, S; Bril, V; Barnett, C; Guptill, JT; Sanders, DB; Hobson-Webb, L; Ou, C ...
Published in: Muscle Nerve
December 2016

INTRODUCTION: The MG-QOL15 is a validated, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure for myasthenia gravis (MG). Widespread use of the scale gave us the opportunity to further analyze its clinimetric properties. METHODS: We first performed Rasch analysis on >1,300 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life scale (MG-QOL15) completed surveys. Results were discussed during a conference call with specialists and biostatisticians. We decided to revise 3 items and prospectively evaluate the revised scale (MG-QOL15r) using either 3, 4, or 5 responses. Rasch analysis was then performed on >1,300 MG-QOL15r scales. RESULTS: The MGQOL15r performed slightly better than the MG-QOL15. The 3-response option MG-QOL15r demonstrated better clinimetric properties than the 4- or 5-option scales. Relative distributions of item and person location estimates showed good coverage of disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: The MG-QOL15r is now the preferred HRQOL instrument for MG because of improved clinimetrics and ease of use. This revision does not negate previous studies or interpretations of results using the MG-QOL15. Muscle Nerve 54: 1015-1022, 2016.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Muscle Nerve

DOI

EISSN

1097-4598

Publication Date

December 2016

Volume

54

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1015 / 1022

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Retrospective Studies
  • Quality of Life
  • Psychometrics
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Myasthenia Gravis
  • Humans
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 31 Biological sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Burns, T. M., Sadjadi, R., Utsugisawa, K., Gwathmey, K. G., Joshi, A., Jones, S., … Conaway, M. (2016). International clinimetric evaluation of the MG-QOL15, resulting in slight revision and subsequent validation of the MG-QOL15r. Muscle Nerve, 54(6), 1015–1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25198
Burns, Ted M., Reza Sadjadi, Kimiaki Utsugisawa, Kelly G. Gwathmey, Amruta Joshi, Sarah Jones, Vera Bril, et al. “International clinimetric evaluation of the MG-QOL15, resulting in slight revision and subsequent validation of the MG-QOL15r.Muscle Nerve 54, no. 6 (December 2016): 1015–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25198.
Burns TM, Sadjadi R, Utsugisawa K, Gwathmey KG, Joshi A, Jones S, et al. International clinimetric evaluation of the MG-QOL15, resulting in slight revision and subsequent validation of the MG-QOL15r. Muscle Nerve. 2016 Dec;54(6):1015–22.
Burns, Ted M., et al. “International clinimetric evaluation of the MG-QOL15, resulting in slight revision and subsequent validation of the MG-QOL15r.Muscle Nerve, vol. 54, no. 6, Dec. 2016, pp. 1015–22. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/mus.25198.
Burns TM, Sadjadi R, Utsugisawa K, Gwathmey KG, Joshi A, Jones S, Bril V, Barnett C, Guptill JT, Sanders DB, Hobson-Webb L, Juel VC, Massey J, Gable KL, Silvestri NJ, Wolfe G, Cutter G, Nagane Y, Murai H, Masuda M, Farrugia ME, Carmichael C, Birnbaum S, Hogrel J-Y, Nafissi S, Fatehi F, Ou C, Liu W, Conaway M. International clinimetric evaluation of the MG-QOL15, resulting in slight revision and subsequent validation of the MG-QOL15r. Muscle Nerve. 2016 Dec;54(6):1015–1022.
Journal cover image

Published In

Muscle Nerve

DOI

EISSN

1097-4598

Publication Date

December 2016

Volume

54

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1015 / 1022

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Retrospective Studies
  • Quality of Life
  • Psychometrics
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Myasthenia Gravis
  • Humans
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 31 Biological sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences