Stroke Risk After Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Aortic Stenosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a possible complication after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS), impacting morbidity and mortality. Accurate estimates of the proportion of individuals who experience stroke within and beyond the periprocedural period after transcatheter AVR (TAVR), surgical AVR, and valve-in-valve (ViV) replacement are essential for management and prognostication. The objective was to determine the proportion of adults aged >18 who experienced an ischemic stroke after bioprosthetic AVR for AS. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted from database inception through March 2024. Studies reporting on stroke rates at least 90 days after bioprosthetic AVR for severe AS, including ViV procedures, and meeting predefined eligibility criteria were included. The pooled proportion of individuals experiencing a stroke was estimated for TAVR and ViV procedures, whereas comparative analyses between TAVR and surgical AVR were performed using mixed-effects models in studies directly comparing both procedures. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were included in the native AS treatment cohort, and 5 in the ViV subanalysis. In native AS, the pooled 30-day proportion of individuals who had a stroke after TAVR was 3.0% (95% CI, 2.5-3.9), with different studies reporting major and minor stroke proportions of 1.7% each. At 1 year, all stroke proportion was 5.0% (95% CI, 4.0-6.0), major stroke was 3.0%, and minor stroke was 2.0%. Comparative analysis demonstrated that TAVR was associated with significantly lower odds of all stroke at 30 days compared with surgical AVR (odds ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.57-0.93]). No significant difference in the proportions of individuals who had a stroke was observed in TAVR versus surgical AVR at 1, 2, or 5 years. In the ViV cohort, the pooled 30-day and 1-year all stroke proportion after ViV was 2.0% (95% CI, 1.0-3.0) and 3.0% (95% CI, 2.0-6.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides updated estimates of stroke after bioprosthetic AVR for AS, capturing risk beyond the early periprocedural period. Future studies should investigate the causes of long-term stroke post-AVR, the effects of different antithrombotic therapies on the risk of stroke, as well as the potential impact of these procedures on short and long-term cognitive function.

Duke Scholars

Author Melissa Anne Daubert Medicine, Cardiology

Author Dylan Thomas Ryan Neurology, Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Author Wuwei Feng Neurology, Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Author Brian C. Mac Grory Neurology, Stroke and Vascular Neurology

Author Tracy Truong  

Author Samantha Kaplan  

Author Nada Kais El Husseini Neurology, Stroke and Vascular Neurology