Skip to main content

Long-term adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention therapies in coronary artery disease.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Newby, LK; LaPointe, NMA; Chen, AY; Kramer, JM; Hammill, BG; DeLong, ER; Muhlbaier, LH; Califf, RM
Published in: Circulation
January 17, 2006

BACKGROUND: Studies have examined the use of evidence-based therapies for coronary artery disease (CAD) in the short term and at hospital discharge, but few have evaluated long-term use. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease for the years 1995 to 2002, we determined the annual prevalence and consistency of self-reported use of aspirin, beta-blockers, lipid-lowering agents, and their combinations in all CAD patients and of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in those with and without heart failure. Logistic-regression models identified characteristics associated with consistent use (reported on > or =2 consecutive follow-up surveys and then through death, withdrawal, or study end), and Cox proportional-hazards models explored the association of consistent use with mortality. Use of all agents and combinations thereof increased yearly. In 2002, 83% reported aspirin use; 61%, beta-blocker use; 63%, lipid-lowering therapy use; 54%, aspirin and beta-blocker use; and 39%, use of all 3. Consistent use was as follows: For aspirin, 71%; beta-blockers, 46%; lipid-lowering therapy, 44%; aspirin and beta-blockers, 36%; and all 3, 21%. Among patients without heart failure, 39% reported ACEI use in 2002; consistent use was 20%. Among heart failure patients, ACEI use was 51% in 2002 and consistent use, 39%. Except for ACEIs among patients without heart failure, consistent use was associated with lower adjusted mortality: Aspirin hazard ratio (HR), 0.58 and 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54 to 0.62; beta-blockers, HR, 0.63 and 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.67; lipid-lowering therapy, HR, 0.52 and 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.65; all 3, HR, 0.67 and 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.77; aspirin and beta-blockers, HR, 0.61 and 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.65; and ACEIs among heart failure patients, HR, 0.75 and 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.84. CONCLUSIONS: Use of evidence-based therapies for CAD has improved but remains suboptimal. Although improved discharge prescription of these agents is needed, considerable attention must also be focused on understanding and improving long-term adherence.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Circulation

DOI

EISSN

1524-4539

Publication Date

January 17, 2006

Volume

113

Issue

2

Start / End Page

203 / 212

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Prevalence
  • Patient Compliance
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Logistic Models
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Newby, L. K., LaPointe, N. M. A., Chen, A. Y., Kramer, J. M., Hammill, B. G., DeLong, E. R., … Califf, R. M. (2006). Long-term adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention therapies in coronary artery disease. Circulation, 113(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.505636
Newby, L Kristin, Nancy M Allen LaPointe, Anita Y. Chen, Judith M. Kramer, Bradley G. Hammill, Elizabeth R. DeLong, Lawrence H. Muhlbaier, and Robert M. Califf. “Long-term adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention therapies in coronary artery disease.Circulation 113, no. 2 (January 17, 2006): 203–12. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.505636.
Newby LK, LaPointe NMA, Chen AY, Kramer JM, Hammill BG, DeLong ER, et al. Long-term adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention therapies in coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2006 Jan 17;113(2):203–12.
Newby, L. Kristin, et al. “Long-term adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention therapies in coronary artery disease.Circulation, vol. 113, no. 2, Jan. 2006, pp. 203–12. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.505636.
Newby LK, LaPointe NMA, Chen AY, Kramer JM, Hammill BG, DeLong ER, Muhlbaier LH, Califf RM. Long-term adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention therapies in coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2006 Jan 17;113(2):203–212.

Published In

Circulation

DOI

EISSN

1524-4539

Publication Date

January 17, 2006

Volume

113

Issue

2

Start / End Page

203 / 212

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Prevalence
  • Patient Compliance
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Logistic Models
  • Humans
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Female