Skip to main content
Journal cover image

A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Horwhat, JD; Paulson, EK; McGrath, K; Branch, MS; Baillie, J; Tyler, D; Pappas, T; Enns, R; Robuck, G; Stiffler, H; Jowell, P
Published in: Gastrointest Endosc
June 2006

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing pancreatic cancer by EUS-FNA is a potentially appealing alternative to percutaneous biopsy. AIM: To compare EUS-FNA with CT or US-guided FNA for diagnosing pancreatic cancer. DESIGN: Single center, prospective, randomized, cross-over. SETTING: Duke University Medical Center. POPULATION: Eighty-four patients referred with suspicious solid pancreatic mass lesions randomized to CT/US-FNA (n = 43) or EUS-FNA (n = 41). INTERVENTION: Patients underwent an imaging procedure/FNA. If cytology was nondiagnostic, cross over to the other modality was offered. Final outcome was determined by clinical follow-up every 6 months for 2 years and/or surgical pathology for patients with negative FNA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Sensitivity and accuracy of EUS-FNA versus CT/US-FNA for pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: There were 16 true positive (TP) by CT/US-FNA and 21 TP by EUS-FNA. Sixteen of the 20 CT/US-FNA negative patients crossed over to EUS-FNA; 12 underwent FNA, 4 had no mass at EUS. Seven of the 12 had positive EUS-FNA. Eight EUS-FNA negative crossed over to CT/US; 4 had no mass at CT/US, 3 remained true negative throughout follow-up, 1 had chronic pancreatitis at surgery. The sensitivity of CT/US-FNA and EUS-FNA for detecting malignancy was 62% and 84%, respectively. A comparison of the accuracy for CT/US-FNA and EUS-FNA was not statistically significant (P = .074, chi(2)). LIMITATIONS: Failure to meet target enrollment resulted in an inability to demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the 2 modalities. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA is numerically (though not quite statistically) superior to CT/US-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Gastrointest Endosc

DOI

ISSN

0016-5107

Publication Date

June 2006

Volume

63

Issue

7

Start / End Page

966 / 975

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology
  • Female
  • Endosonography
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Horwhat, J. D., Paulson, E. K., McGrath, K., Branch, M. S., Baillie, J., Tyler, D., … Jowell, P. (2006). A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc, 63(7), 966–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.028
Horwhat, John David, Erik K. Paulson, Kevin McGrath, M Stanley Branch, John Baillie, Douglas Tyler, Theodore Pappas, et al. “A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions.Gastrointest Endosc 63, no. 7 (June 2006): 966–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.028.
Horwhat JD, Paulson EK, McGrath K, Branch MS, Baillie J, Tyler D, et al. A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jun;63(7):966–75.
Horwhat, John David, et al. “A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions.Gastrointest Endosc, vol. 63, no. 7, June 2006, pp. 966–75. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.028.
Horwhat JD, Paulson EK, McGrath K, Branch MS, Baillie J, Tyler D, Pappas T, Enns R, Robuck G, Stiffler H, Jowell P. A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jun;63(7):966–975.
Journal cover image

Published In

Gastrointest Endosc

DOI

ISSN

0016-5107

Publication Date

June 2006

Volume

63

Issue

7

Start / End Page

966 / 975

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology
  • Female
  • Endosonography