Clinical research in the lay press: irresponsible journalism raises a huge dose of doubt.
Publication
, Journal Article
Anaissie, EJ; Segal, BH; Graybill, JR; Arndt, C; Perfect, JR; Kleinberg, M; Pappas, P; Benjamin, D; Rubin, R; Aberg, JA; Adderson, EE; Akan, H ...
Published in: Clin Infect Dis
October 15, 2006
Duke Scholars
Published In
Clin Infect Dis
DOI
EISSN
1537-6591
Publication Date
October 15, 2006
Volume
43
Issue
8
Start / End Page
1031 / 1039
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- United States
- Research
- Professional Misconduct
- Peptides, Cyclic
- Patient Selection
- Newspapers as Topic
- Multicenter Studies as Topic
- Microbiology
- Los Angeles
- Lipopeptides
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Anaissie, E. J., Segal, B. H., Graybill, J. R., Arndt, C., Perfect, J. R., Kleinberg, M., … Zaoutis, T. (2006). Clinical research in the lay press: irresponsible journalism raises a huge dose of doubt. Clin Infect Dis, 43(8), 1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1086/509116
Anaissie, Elias J., Brahm H. Segal, John R. Graybill, Carola Arndt, John R. Perfect, Michael Kleinberg, Peter Pappas, et al. “Clinical research in the lay press: irresponsible journalism raises a huge dose of doubt.” Clin Infect Dis 43, no. 8 (October 15, 2006): 1031–39. https://doi.org/10.1086/509116.
Anaissie EJ, Segal BH, Graybill JR, Arndt C, Perfect JR, Kleinberg M, et al. Clinical research in the lay press: irresponsible journalism raises a huge dose of doubt. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Oct 15;43(8):1031–9.
Anaissie, Elias J., et al. “Clinical research in the lay press: irresponsible journalism raises a huge dose of doubt.” Clin Infect Dis, vol. 43, no. 8, Oct. 2006, pp. 1031–39. Pubmed, doi:10.1086/509116.
Anaissie EJ, Segal BH, Graybill JR, Arndt C, Perfect JR, Kleinberg M, Pappas P, Benjamin D, Rubin R, Aberg JA, Adderson EE, Adler-Shohet FC, Akan H, Akova M, Almyroudis NG, Alexander BD, Andes D, Arrieta A, Baddley JW, Barron MA, Belzberg H, Boucher HW, Boyce TG, Casadevall A, Chandrasekar PH, Cleary JD, Cordonnier C, Cornely OA, Cuenca-Estrella M, Daly JS, Daoura N, Denning DW, dePauw B, de Repentigny L, Dignani MC, Dismukes WE, Donnelly JP, Donowitz GR, Dupont B, Drusano G, Ellis M, Espinel-Ingroff A, Fishman JA, Fleming R, Forrest G, Ghannoum M, Goldman M, Grazziutti M, Greene JN, Greenberg RN, Gubbins PO, Hadley S, Herbrecht R, Hiemenz JW, Hope W, Hospenthal DR, Husain S, Ito JI, Jacobson RM, Johnson M, Keating MR, Kett DH, Knapp K, Kontoyiannis DP, Krcmery VC, Larsen R, Laverdiere M, Ljungman P, Lortholary O, Maertens J, Marriott D, Mattiuzzi G, McGinnis MR, Morris M, Nucci M, Odds FC, Pankey GA, Patterson T, Pfaller M, Razonable RR, Reboli AC, Rinaldi MG, Roberts GD, Rodriguez Tudela JL, Rotstein C, Ruhnke M, Schuster M, Shoham S, Sia IG, Siebel N, Silviera F, Singh N, Sobel J, Solomkin JS, Sorrell TC, Steinbach WJ, Temesgen Z, Tortorano A, Vartivarian S, VerWeij P, Viscoli C, Viviani MA, Walker RC, Wheat JL, Wiley J, Williamson P, Wingard JR, Yu VL, Zaoutis T. Clinical research in the lay press: irresponsible journalism raises a huge dose of doubt. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Oct 15;43(8):1031–1039.
Published In
Clin Infect Dis
DOI
EISSN
1537-6591
Publication Date
October 15, 2006
Volume
43
Issue
8
Start / End Page
1031 / 1039
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- United States
- Research
- Professional Misconduct
- Peptides, Cyclic
- Patient Selection
- Newspapers as Topic
- Multicenter Studies as Topic
- Microbiology
- Los Angeles
- Lipopeptides